In Dec. 1995. The Royal Society claimed that there was nothing new in it and what was new was wrong. In the light of the discovery that Big Bang could not possibly have happened.Is an apology now in order? Also it is now known that the universe is entirely empty, even solids such as gold and lead are almost 100% space. So what else could operate gravity.
But a pull on space itself by spin? New Gravity where there is not an attraction of mass for another mass but a pull on space itself by spin. This gives a correct view of the cause of redshift in light from distant stars and galaxies. No change in light within a galaxy but further and further away greater and greater redshift.
The amount of space travelled against the gravity from its origin lengthens the wavelength of the light inevitably showing redshift to the observer.
A win for New Gravity, anything else?